>>Anyone care to tell me where I've gone wrong in this analysis? I can
>>and do make mistakes! <grin>
>>
>
>
> The clock on the LX-200 is trivial....Don't worry about it and
>everything will be fine

Right. Or if you want to use it as a convenient "wristwatch" just set it
any old way and don't worry about a few seconds here and there.

>there is only 8 planets (most you can see)

Well, I've seen nine planets with my LX200 (Earth counts, you know :-)

> and
>having the time off a bit will not hurt a thing. My program for getting
>wwv time allows the difference of the phone lines and distance of the
>user.

Or you can just use NTP:
http://www.yahoo.com/Computers_and_Internet/Information_and_Documentation/Proto
cols/NTP__Network_Time_Protocol_/

---
Bill Arnett "Science is a way of trying
San Jose, CA USA not to fool yourself." -- Feynman

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: LX200 :ROM Upgrades, Bill Arnett
Next message: Re: [M]: LX200 clock accuracy, Bill Arnett
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: LX200 clock accuracy, Bill Arnett
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: LX200 clock accuracy, Email address hidden