| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: [M]: 35 mm Panoptic results question
From: Bill Arnett
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Fri Jan 02 22:50:13 1998
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
At 8:14 PM -0800 1/2/98, Kip Peterson wrote:
>Hello all, and Happy New Year!
>
>Fro Christmas, I received from my spouse a Tele Vue 35 mm Panoptic
>eyepiece. Nice spouse, eh? Anyway, I was wondering if other LX200 10"
>f/10 owners with this eyepiece could comment on its edge-to-edge
>sharpness. I seem to note a slight edge coma, though not objectionable.
>Overall, the performance is breathtaking, but I was wondering if others
>noted the same lack of perfect focus edge-to-edge. If so, does their
>"Paracorr" product help, or is this for Newtonian scopes only, and not
>SCTs?
I believe the Paracorr is only for fast scopes. Is yours an f/10 or f/6.3?
My initial reaction to the 35mm Panoptic was the obvious non-flatness of
the field. It bothered me for a few days. But now I hardly notice it at
all. The brain is a wonderful spatial filter :-)
---
Bill Arnett "Science is a way of trying
San Jose, CA USA not to fool yourself." -- Feynman
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: LX200 features revisited, Ric L Ecker
Next message: Re: [M]: HELP!, Ric L Ecker
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: 35 mm Panoptic results question , Ric L Ecker
Previous message in thread: [M]: 35 mm Panoptic results question , Kip Peterson
|
|