| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: [M]: Re: LX200: Meade "support"
From: Andy Wallace
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Fri Jan 30 08:08:54 1998
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
Ray-two thoughts that don't cure the Meade problem but will get you running.
A Telrad finder($40) is vastly superior to the finder scope and the Dec cord
is a telephone cord--a longer one from Radio Shack is better than the
Meade--cost-$6. Andy K5VM
-----Original Message-----
Date: Friday, January 30, 1998 2:22 AM
Subject: [M]: LX200: Meade "support"
>Dec motor cord missing from package, EP on finderscope wobbles badly
>when screwing it in/out of finder. Informed Meade 9 Jan, called again
>a week later ("It takes 7-10 days."). Called again 28 Jan ("I'll check
>on it and call you back.") Needless to say, they didn't call back that
>day or the next. Hell, I could have driven down there and picked it up
>weeks ago! (Would have cost about $25 in gasoline and a full day.)
>
>The strange part was that John Piper said to wait till the replacements
>arrived before sending the finderscope back, using the RGA number he
>gave me. Warranty wording implies you must send defective components
>back with proof of purchase first.
>
>What does it take to get action from these folks? In view of the
>above, somehow I don't think it would be a good idea for me to send 'em
>the original of my sales slip from Woodland Hills Camera.
>
>
>
>
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: LX200: Meade "support", Mike McCammant
Next message: Re: [M]: collimation, AstroDesigns-Ed Stewart
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: LX200: Meade "support", Email address hidden
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: LX200: Meade "support", Mike McCammant
|
|