Astronomy Site: Meade Advanced Products Users Group Archive: Re: [M]: OAG, 201XT, and LX-50's


 

  [index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]
 
Subject: Re: [M]: OAG, 201XT, and LX-50's
From: Rick & Melissa Keil
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Mon Feb 02 10:33:46 1998

While you're here, how about checking out the Astronomy Book List ?

John F. Wall wrote:
>
> Hi Rick
> I have an LX-50, 201XT and the Meade OAG and as of today still haven't had
> it working together. In discussions with Meade there are several problems
> involved.
>
> 1. The cable that connects the 201XT to the scope. Meade informs me that
> the cable MUST MUST MUST be the flat grey cable. Any other cable that may
> have come with the 201XT may cause problems. It has now been replaced.
>
> 2. The dec motor over-corrects and the image moves off the chip during
> calibration. Meade is now sending me a new upgraded dec motor and chip
> (rev. 6.0) which will stop this over-correction.
>
> Because of these problems the 201XT would not calibrate at all. Hopefully
> we'll be up and running in two weeks provided Meades back order on these
> new dec motors gets filled this week.

Have you been able to ust the 201 through the main tube? Mine works
great when I do that. (For more info on my problem, see my other posting
with the same subject line).

>
> That said, try your illuminated reticle in your OAG and see how far your
> guide star moves through the FOV before it disappears. Your FOV may not be
> great enough.

The Lumicon OAG has a very large prism, so the star is able to move all
the way acroos the FOV in all directions. I think my problem might be
I'm using a star diagonal in my off axis port in front of the 201 so I
can reach focus. Lumicon sells a longer extension tube so I won't have
to use the diagonal. Maybe that would help. Another thing I've
contemplated buying is Lumicon's 2.5X CCD reducer (reduces to f/4 for an
8" f/10 SCT). It supposedly attaches to the nose of the 201, giving a
better star image for the 201 to guide on.

> I had to tweak my prism to get the max. FOV possible. I
> didn't realize how small it was until I tried moving a star through dec and
> seeing it disapear before it got to the edge of the percieved FOV.
>
> Hope this helps some.
>
> John Wall

Thanks John. I appreciate all input.
Rick Keil
"7/5th of all people do not understand fractions." - unknown

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: OAG, 201XT, and LX-50's, Rick & Melissa Keil
Next message: [M]: E Mail Address., Stanley Brower
Next message in thread: [M]: RE: OAG, 201XT, and LX-50's, Richmann, Michael
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: OAG, 201XT, and LX-50's, Rick & Melissa Keil


  [AstronomySite] Return to the www.AstronomySite.com home page
  [ShareWareEtc] Looking for great shareware? Then try Shareware Etcetera
  [Newsgroup Info] Want to learn more about how internet newsgroups and newsgroup downloaders work?
  [Astronomy Book List] Great prices and a great selection on astronomy books!