| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: [M]: Re: Barlow Question
From: Andy Wallace
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Wed Oct 21 09:47:37 1998
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
Just as an aside-Naglers already have a barlow built into the lens.
Andy
Jack Estes wrote:
> You wrote:
> If a person has a 10" LX and a 9mm Nagler, 19mm Nagler, 22mm Panoptic,
> and 35mm Panoptic, would one benefit from getting the 2" Barlow from
> Tele Vue any for visual use?
>
> My reply: With that spread of eyepiece focal lengths, I don't think you
> would benefit from a barlow. I have the Meade #140 and rarely use it.
> It adds an extra bit of glass and the eyepieces you mentioned have
> plenty of glass to reduce the brightness of your intended object.
> I have yet to see a barlow at a given power that equals a well made
> eyepiece alone at the same power. Barlows do increase eye relief but
> all the eyepieces you mentioned are decent in that area.
>
> (http://www.precision-camera.com)
> Austin,TX Astronomical Society
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: 201 XT autoguider problem, Arthur Babcock
Next message: [M]: Mapug threaded archives (not the topical ones), Gregory Donohue
Next message in thread: [M]: Barlow Question, Cecil Acuff
Previous message in thread: [M]: Re: Barlow Question, Jack Estes
|
|