Mike--

I think even if you had some minor color, that would be a non-issue. The most
persistent discussion in the astrophotograpy group seems to be various ways to adjust
image color by scanning the pics(with scanners that cost thousands in some cases) and
then computer processing them. I agree that for the money the Meade refractors are a
great buy. I never understood why some pay thousands extra to get a color free "APO"
refractor (or alledgely color free) and then change the colors in their pics with
extensive computer processing..

Clear skies, Andy

M. Gartland wrote:

> Actaully...Ralph...may or may not agree with this...I don't have any of the types
> of problems that the LX200 folks have with a LXD 650...Ralph is right, make sure
> you are in balance, and not signicantly over spec. weight. But as a GOTO GEM
> mount, it's pretty darn good.
>
> My Meade 5" APO is sharp and color free. Other would say that is impossible. I
> have had it for 2 years now and some pretty nice photos too. Check the price on
> another 5" refractor setup like this.
>
> m.
>
>
> > Nick:
> > About the same, the motors and electronics are similar. With the
> > equitorial mount you must make sure that you keep the the scope balanced. If
> > the balance is significantly off, the RA motor might stall and if you are not
> > around, the motor can burn up costing you $250 for repair to Meade. The LX650
> > mount is excellant for photography, and the "go to" works as well as the
> > LX200. The LX750 drive and tripod is Much bigger and heavier. Good luck
> >
> > Ralph G

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: Mosaic image.., Email address hidden
Next message: RE: [M]: Meade APOs, Renato Langersek
Next message in thread: RE: [M]: Meade APOs, Renato Langersek
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Meade APOs, M. Gartland