Bob Guilbert wrote:
>
> I thought about that but then it should move at least 1x to E.
> If what you suggest is Meade's solution it deserves the big cheese award.
> I'm discovering they could have made a few better design choices given the
> cheap cost of electronics these days. Can anyone pls verify theirs does not
> move by peeking under the bottom cover plate at 2x-East?
> Thanks,
> BG

As Phil stated, this is exactly how it should operate. That rate works
very well too, when guiding. Of coarse I don't have a 1X rate to compare
it to, but I've never noticed or had any problems with the 2X speeds
East or West.

PS- I did verify it with my LX50.

Rick Keil
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/4278/

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: LX50 Dec drive idea, Rick & Melissa Keil
Next message: Re: [M]: Re: cable release for LX200/SLR control, RICHARD WINTER
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: No E movement at 2X speed on LX50, Bob Guilbert
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: No E movement at 2X speed on LX50, Ric L Ecker