| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: RE: [M]: Re: Polaris - or not.
From: Heath, Andrew
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Tue May 04 01:58:23 1999
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
I had a similar problem as you described below, the time,long & lat were
fine, what caused my GoTo to bewrong was the fact that the tripod wasn't
level because the bubble level on the Superwedge gives notoriously false
readings! I have since installed two torpedo levels on the base plate of the
Superwedge and it is now working well.
Andy.
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: 04 May 1999 09:00
> Subject: Re: [M]: Re: Polaris - or not.
>
> At 7:37 AM +0000 5/4/99, Lawrence Harris wrote:
> >Following my earlier e-mail, I can confirm that I have the scope
> >centred on Polaris (identified as the bright double star). After
> >sync-ing on the second star (Denebola), the 'goto' is consistently at
> >least half-a-finder's view out. I have meticulously checked the time
> >(GMT and 0 offset), lat (50), long (4W).
>
> You have to be more accurate than that. 50N 4W is in the middle of
> the English Channel, if I'm reading my map right. You'll need the
> time accurate to a minute or so, as well.
>
> Bill Arnett
> http://www.seds.org/billa/
> "I know that I am mortal and the creature of a day; but when I search
> out the massed wheeling circles of the stars, my feet no longer touch
> the earth, but, side by side with Zeus himself, I take my fill of
> ambrosia, the food of the gods." -- Claudius Ptolemaeus (Ptolemy)
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: Re: LX200 Dec Stops Responding, Colin James
Next message: [M]: [M] [ OT] pier information, Email address hidden
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: Re: Polaris - or not., Chris Vedeler
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Re: Polaris - or not., Bill Arnett
|
|