| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: [M]: 10 inch vs 12 in LX-200
From: Ric L Ecker
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Fri May 14 16:54:22 1999
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
No problem, this is perfect..................I've never seen html
before this, it even said it was html with all the coding and headers and
html strings. Most of the MIME is not so bad because the body of the
message is all in one area but every sentence ends with a =20 and it has
a lot of beginning gibberish and end gibberish but the message is
generally in the center and clear to the reader. It must be the Outlook
Express because Microsoft seems to want everthing to be web
based..........take a lot below:..............ric
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>After all the discussion about light
=
waveleghnts=20
and such .does anyone know who sell an adjustable intensidy LED desklamp
=
Blind=20
in Montana Bob OLeary</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0004_01BE9DEA.A99D02A0--
writes:
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Date: Thursday, May 13, 1999 10:45 PM
>Subject: Re: [M]: 10 inch vs 12 in LX-200
>
>
>
>>
>>Is it possible that Brian sent html and my attachment caught the
>stuff??
>
>
>As far as I know, I'm not sending html, but I am using Outlook Express
>(yechh!).
>Ric, if this reply is causing problems, let me know.
>
>Brian
>
>>Doc G <http://www.mailbag.com/users/ragreiner>
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Damaged LX-200, Ric L Ecker
Next message: Re: [M]: ccd: flat field, James Lyon
Next message in thread: [M]: 10 inch vs 12 in LX-200, Brian Straight
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: 10 inch vs 12 in LX-200, Wayne Watson
|
|