Frank Schwartz wrote:
>
> I'm considering getting a Meade Flip Mirror, and I noticed quite a price
> difference between the two models. Besides the 1.25" vs. 2", what is the
> difference? They say in the ad that the 2" model is highly recommended for
> 35mm SLR astrophotography. That is exactly what I want it for.
> Is it really worth a $100 difference? I was considering getting a 2" prism,
> but do people who have these actually leave them in like the ad says?
> Is it worth $250 for the better one, or should I be looking at something
> else like a taurus?
>
> Frank Schwartz

Frank,

I've been using the 2" Meade Flip Mirror for a couple of months now and
I like it very much. However, for 35 SLR work I prefer the Van Slike
Flipper because it is easier to attach the camera. The Meade is of very
good quality; better than the Van Slike. Its main flaws:
- when using combined 1 1/4 - 2" EP, the mirror can be dammaged
- needs a few extra connections to use a SLR
- same with reducers
I think, the Meade Flip Mirror is a superb piece of equipment for CCD
work but not necessarly for conventional photography.

Bert Mettier

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: SCT Focusing, Jerry Horne
Next message: Re: [M]: Major Malfunction, Bjorn Heijligers
Next message in thread: [M]: Meade flip mirrors, Dennis
Previous message in thread: [M]: Meade flip mirrors, Frank Schwartz