| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: [M]: Wide field visual use of 12" LX-200
From: Bill Arnett
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Tue Jun 29 00:02:56 1999
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
At 11:07 PM -0400 6/28/99, Carl wrote:
>I have read (and reread) Doc G's site. I am interested in the best
>way to visually adapt my 12" to F6.3, while avoiding vignetting.
>
>Possible answers:
>
>1. Buy Meade or Celestron F6.3 focal reducer and vignette above 32
>mm or so, thus losing some wide field. By the way, my lowest power
>eyepieces are 2" Panoptic 35 mm and a generic 2" 62 mm.
A 35mm Panoptic will vignette badly with a 12" LX200 and a Celestron
f6.3 focal reducer. So much so that I never use mine.
>2. Lumicon Giant Easy Guider - I am now limited by the Meade 2"
>diagonal, not by the visual back supplied with the telescope, right?
Right. And as I understand it you can fiddle with the GEG to get
various f ratios.
>3. Jim's mobile 2" motofocuser - again I'm limited by the 2" Meade
>diagonal - ID is several mm under 2"
This doesn't get you to f6.3 but it is a huge improvement over the
meade focuser.
Bill Arnett
http://www.seds.org/billa/
"Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself." -- Richard Feynman
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: RE: LX200 Purchase: Which dealer?, Wayne A. Gregory
Next message: RE: [M]: New observatory question, B. S. Jones
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: Wide field visual use of 12" LX-200, Jim Nomura
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Wide field visual use of 12" LX-200, R. A. Greiner
|
|