> I have gotten this and I find it rather old and hard to use.

I think this problem is a question of habit. Me, I find the PAP
easy to use and I've tried the demo Maxim and I've found it hard to use
but I'm sure that with some work, I could try to learn it.

Sure, for me the PAP is the best since I program a little in it.
And the next release will be worderfull.

See
http://www.astrosurf.org/saturne/pap/Users.html
for a list of professional observatories wich uses the PAP

Philippe



PAP : http://www.astrosurf.org/pap/
Obs Narbonne : http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jacques.cazenove/
Ccd Bazar : http://www.astrosurf.com/ccdbazar/

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: unsubscribe, Mitchell J. Thompson
Next message: Re: [M]: What is the best/most cost effective CCD image processing , wyn palmer
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: What is the best/most cost effective CCD image processing , wyn palmer
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: What is the best/most cost effective CCD image processing, Maurice Leonard Clark