If that's the case then your all set.
Doug
Hi Ric,

I may be confused, but I thought that the JMI focuser replicated the rear
port, i.e., same size and TPI as the rear port with an attachment that is
supplied with the JMI unit. Therefore, anything that normally threaded to
the
rear port would also mount on the JMI unit. Can anyone answer this?

mark

Ric L Ecker wrote:

> Maybe I'm missing some term that you are using that makes your statement
> confusing. When you state a Visual Back are you discribing the small
> piece that is screwed onto the threaded (Male threads) of the back of the
> SCT. Example, the eyepiece projection tube uses the Visual Back to
> attach itself to the scopes threads and what you are saying is that the
> Kendrick's unit does the same, is this correct. The Kendrick unit that I
> tested "did not" use the visual back and attached directly to the
> threaded male thread of the SCT. No Visual Back needed to make it work.
> Someone said they had problems using the Kendricks with the JMI focuser,
> why not remove the JMI and the unit would fit????

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Kendrick SCT Laser Collimator, karen albig smith
Next message: Re: [M]: RE: LX200: New OTA alignment procedure, Wayne Watson
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: Re: Kendrick SCT Laser Collimator, Stephen Walters
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Kendrick SCT Laser Collimator, karen albig smith