| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
--------------2569196C67F119151BA8157B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> This "large pixels" cr*p bascially came from an article in
> CCD Astronomy several years ago. The author really pushed
> undersampling (basicaly FOV = seeing) as being great _for_the_
> beginner_ as it covers up errors. Which it does. But it
> also means that (1) you'll be severly hindered in improving
> your skills as you'll never see your errors, and (2) when you
> finally do improve your skills to where you want to take good
> images you have to go out and buy a new camera.
>
Thanks for the advice Gene!
Yes, I had been reading my old copies of CCD Astronomy.
Dave
--------------2569196C67F119151BA8157B
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><i>This "large pixels" cr*p bascially came from an
article in</i>
<br><i>CCD Astronomy several years ago. The author really pushed</i>
<br><i>undersampling (basicaly FOV = seeing) as being great _for_the_</i>
<br><i>beginner_ as it covers up errors. Which it does. But
it</i>
<br><i>also means that (1) you'll be severly hindered in improving</i>
<br><i>your skills as you'll never see your errors, and (2) when you</i>
<br><i>finally do improve your skills to where you want to take good</i>
<br><i>images you have to go out and buy a new camera.</i>
<br> </blockquote>
Thanks for the advice Gene!
<p>Yes, I had been reading my old copies of CCD Astronomy.
<p>Dave
<br> </html>
--------------2569196C67F119151BA8157B--
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: unsubscribe, Paul Robinson III
Next message: Re: [M]: ST-9E for 12"LX200, Gene Horr
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: ST-9E for 12"LX200, Gene Horr
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: ST-9E for 12"LX200, R. A. Greiner
|
|