| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: [M]: Re: Another Eyepiece Question
From: Andrew Jackson
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Mon Dec 27 03:55:15 1999
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
Doug Kranz wrote:-
I have the LX200 10" f10.
I own a 6.7 mm Meade UWA eyepiece but I find that even with planetary, I do
not use it very often. I would be curious to know from others with the same
scope, which high power eyepieces you use, how useful is anything below a
10mm in your viewing experience, and any testimonials as to which one you
prefer?
Thanks in advance,
Doug
Doug,
I have several eyepieces including the Meade UWA 6.7. I know the Naglers are
popular but I do not have one. I do have some Pentax XL and a Takahashi 5mm.
On those once a year nights I can use the Takahashi and it is superb. Most
of the time I am using the 10mm, 14mm Pentax or the Meade 18mm SWA. I rarely
use the 6.7mm. Of all the eyepieces I have find the Pentax to be the best,
least distortion, max eye relief, less colouration.
Hope this helps
Andrew Jackson
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: 10" LX-200 DEC Runaway/Dead, Tom & Liz Porter
Next message: [M]: Advice: LX200, SBIG-ST237, Software, Larry Owens
Next message in thread: [M]: Re: Another Eyepiece Question, Gregg Ruppel
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Another Eyepiece Question, Ric L Ecker
|
|