| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: [M]: Re: Another Eyepiece Question
From: Ric L Ecker
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Tue Dec 28 22:05:31 1999
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
(Depriving a village somewhere of an idiot) writes:
>That's several people now singing the praises of the 32mm and 40mm
>Konig
>EPs. I'm looking for something in the 32mm - 40mm range to replace
>the Meade 40mm Super Plossl that I don't like. I was considering the
>35mm Panoptic, but now I'm leaning towards the 40mm Konig for under
>$200.
>Would others concur?
I don't know why people are singing the praise of the Konig eyepiece
because it is an old design. If the design was so great then why are the
bigger manufacturers not coping this design. The Konig was King Kong for
a time but has been surpassed by better designs in the wide field
arena............ric
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Re: Cold keypad, Email address hidden
Next message: Re: [M]: LX200 retrograde motion in declination, advice needed., Ric L Ecker
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: Re: Another Eyepiece Question, Joe Hartley
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Re: Another Eyepiece Question, Louis Halikman
|
|