Here we go again with the 201 vs. ST-4 debate, both guiders have their
merits. I have own both types and will say that I had no problems with
either. The 201 is lighter and simpler to use and the ST-4 has more bells
and whisles and can guide on fainter objects, which is no big thing
anyway. The 201 for its price "is a best buy". I owned the 201 for 3
years and the St-4 for over 2 yrs. I have several friends in our club
that still use the 201 without any problems. If someone has a problem
using either instrument is that the fault of the
instrument??????????????? ric
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: Re: Re: RE: Photo developing, Dean Franks
Next message: Re: [M]: Photo developing, Ric L Ecker
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Re: pictor 210 autoguider, Greg Hartke