writes:
>
>Ric,
> The only problem is in your head (as Usual) there is NO debate. If
>you would
>start paying attention the the original posts we would eliminate this
>sort of
>thing. Someone new to the group simply wanted to know which autoguider
>was the
>best choice for his hard earned money.
>Dick

Believe me, I understand and was not responding to his question, I was
responding to the "I heard that this was best" and "I gave up using the
201 after one month" Do you see where I'm going with this or is it still
in my head (as Usual)sp................If you can't use the 201 you
should give up CCD's because everything is harder from there.
IMHO.............I've use both guiders plus the 216 and tested many
others............want to compare notes.....................ric
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: 7" MAK, g. n. paleologopoulos
Next message: Re: [M]: Photo developing --long reply, Ric L Ecker
Next message in thread: Re: [Re: [M]: Re: pictor 210 autoguider], Kal Krishnan
Previous message in thread: Re: [Re: [M]: Re: pictor 210 autoguider], Email address hidden