| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thread-next]
Subject: [M]: 16" LX200 - does yours hold alignment?
From: Joe Hartley
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Wed Aug 09 08:29:48 2000
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
The staff at Frosty Drew Observatory, tired of weeks of cloudy Friday
nights, had our own private observing session last night (our only
perk, but a good one!). Without the crowd queueing up well before
sunset, I had the opportunity to do a leisurely two-star alignment
with our 9mm reticle eyepiece, and had excellent accuracy on all the
GOTOs, even across a wide arc of the sky.
This raised a question to me, answerable only by other folks who are
charged with the care and feeding of these magnificent beasts.
I've done 2-star alignments before, and have good results. This
accuracy never seems to survive a shutdown, even though we religiously
follow the parking sequence given in the manual. I've tried setting
the time to within 1 second of an atomic clock each time I start the
scope, but that hasn't helped. We've tried SYNCing on objects as we
observe; we've tried not SYNCing. No matter what happens, we find that
if we didn't do an alignment that evening, we can be off by as much as
30 arcminutes on a relatively short slew.
So - if you have a permanently mounted 16", how well does yours hold the
alignment? Am I just asking too much of this procedure? Our scope is
mounted alt-az, if it makes a difference.
--
======================================================================
12 Emma G Lane, Narragansett, RI 02882 - vox 401.782.9042
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Re: Slew Key, John Ruthroff
Next message: Re: [M]: Astrophotography problem, Richard Shell
Next message in thread: [M]: Re: 16" LX200 - does yours hold alignment?, Mike & Lynn Rice
|
|