I don't know if it was the titillating subject line
(RE: [M]: Still blowing fuses - RS232 port related) or the following
(censored) reference to certain telephone services, but anyone getting
email through a company using the navistar.com domain will apparently
not see my original message, for I got this email from them:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.

Sender = Joe Hartley
Subject = RE: [M]: Still blowing fuses - RS232 port related
Delivery Time = August 28, 2000 (Monday) 10:44:53
Policy = Anti-Spam
Action on this mail = Quarantine message

Warning message from administrator:
Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Or is it the "Policy = Anti-Spam" line that diverted my message? No
matter; either way, I'd suggest that the folks using Navistar as an ISP
look around for a less self-righteous, censorship-happy ISP. That assumes,
of course, that their censors let any anti-Navistar email through.


> A moron??? I was getting $16/month from people who expected my ISP
> support to be a general computer support line, and I hopefully never
> called *anyone* a moron (even when they deserved it). On a six-figure
> support contract, I feel that the folks on the other end of the line
> should practicaly be giving phone S-*-X in their attempt to make me feel
^^^^^^ The S-word hidden to bypass
Navistar's censor!!
> comfortable with the knowledge and support I'm paying for!


======================================================================
12 Emma G Lane, Narragansett, RI 02882 - vox 401.782.9042
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Light Gathering Ability, Art Morton
Next message: [M]: OT DAS eGroups list, Leroy Guatney
Next message in thread: [M]: RE: (OT) Navistar rejected my message!!!, Doug Walton