As far as astronomy equipment goes 16k is peanuts - actually less than
that, it's the dust left in the bottom of the peanut bag.

The super basic stripped down 16" telescope from DFM is 75k.

Stuff from TORUS will cost you lots more.

Since you don't set this stuff up in the field - a dome will cost you
10k to 300k depending on size and maker.

A mid ranged apogee CCD is around 30k.

Want a "REAL GOOD" telescope - you can have a complete 1 meter turn-key
robotic observatory from SciTech for a mere 779k plus delivery and
installation.



Puts things in perspective huh? Even with all of the little nagging
problems of the Meade lx200 - it's quite amazing what you get for your
money.

-Cary



Jack Estes wrote:
>
> Hmmmm, at 16K for a 16" LX200, I thought Meade "was" the expensive stuff!!!
>
> (http://www.precision-camera.com)
> Wireless phone 512-657-9062
> Austin,TX Astronomical Society, Treasurer
>
> "Meddle not in the affairs of dragons,
> for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup."
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: LX200 Declination drive mods, John Ruthroff
Next message: Re: [M]: Meade vs. the expensive stuff, Cary Chleborad
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: Meade vs. the expensive stuff, Cary Chleborad
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Meade vs. the expensive stuff, RD