[lurk mode off]

I agree with Joe that the sample period is too short here... ;)

The only reason I don't have Bob's Nobs (well, I do hate the way he
spells "nobs" but I digress) is that the 10" f/6.3 was about the last
scope he made them for, and I had already made my own with the parts
from McMasters (as recommended on MAPUG, thanks gang).

If I hadn't already done it, I would drop the few bux for Bob's Nobs
in a heartbeat. I exchanged emails with him while he was developing
them for my scope, have warm fuzzies from that exchange, and agree
that "rave reviews" describes the general impression of his products
well.

[lurk mode on]

Cheers,
Tom



>> Hi All,
>> It looks like the informal survey concludes:
>
>I believe the bulk of Bob's Nobs (or at least the first offerings)
>were for the Celestron SCT's which seem to be even more problematic
>than Meade's with regards to the secondary mount and collimating screws.
>
>never heard a complaint about 'em there, only rave reviews.
>
>Sorry, John!

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Bob's Nobs Revisited, Daniel Doherty
Next message: RE: [M]: Bob's Nobs Revisited, Luis Esteves
Next message in thread: RE: [M]: Bob's Nobs Revisited, Luis Esteves
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Bob's Nobs Revisited, Daniel Doherty