>It already automatically rejects anything not sent by a list member.
>I could separately forward them to you if you want, though ;-)
>
>Luckily <snip> the self-verify process makes
>sure that I know their real email address. Not to mention that they'd
>then be spamming themselves <snip>...

I think we owe John another real round of applause/gratitude for his efforts
on our behalf to avoid getting junk mail. Although filtering at the end
user interface is possible, for the SPAM levels John is describing, each of
us could be waiting major periods of time for filter software to process
hundreds (or worse) SPAM messages. Those who want that kind of problem
should take John up on his offer to forward the junk to them - the rest of
us really appreciate that he keeps it off our back... Thank you, John.
< < < < < < < < > > > > > > > > > > >
301/975-5755 (Voice) Nat'l Inst. of Standards & Technology
301/975-5334 (FAX !NEW#!) 223/A215 (Div 852, MSEL)

Web site: http://www.ceramics.nist.gov/staff/bonnell.htm
& Gallery: http://www.ceramics.nist.gov/gallery/gallery.htm
PLD Workshop: http://amp.nrl.navy.mil/code6670/workshop.html 5/12-13/1998
Opinions expressed by the author may not represent official NIST Policy

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: RE: MAPUG admin: good news / bad news, Jim Schissler
Next message: Re: [M]: OT: Texas Observing Site, Bob Duncan
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: MAPUG admin: good news / bad news, JDDGA
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: RE: MAPUG admin: good news / bad news, Jim Schissler