| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: [M]: RE: MAPUG admin: good news / bad news
From: John Unkovich
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Thu Apr 02 17:57:06 1998
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
--------------4F98049C0E538FDDD7AE16FE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DO NOT LISTEN TO THIS FOOL!
Unk
Michael Hannigan wrote:
> Why not just let them through and leave it up to the end users to delete
> them. It really is our responsibility, not yours, to deal with the spam
> that hits our mailboxes.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> JohnLX200
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 1998 11:13 PM
> Subject: [M]: MAPUG admin: good news / bad news
>
> Some good news and some bad news:
>
> First, the good news: Thank you all for the civil tone on the list lately.
> You are even forgiven for the excessive OT banter in exchange for the good
> behavior.
>
> Next, the bad news:
>
> Apparently mapug has found its way onto a serious SPAM mailing list. It's
> currently at a workable volume, but is rapidly accelerating, making me
> suspect
> that we've made it onto some list of "57 million email addresses for $99"
> and
> is being spread around. I don't believe it is a deliberate attack upon the
> list, just the usual get-rich-quick emails, porno website promotion, etc.
>
> I'd use the Majordomo list server's capabilities to block it, if from
> predictable addresses, but it's coming in from reasonable-looking addresses,
> mostly but not all on AOL, and there are way too many MAPUG members on AOL
> for
> me to just block email from AOL anyway. Not to mention that it would block
> ME
> ;-)
>
> Luckily, it all bounces to my shore.net account without hitting the list,
> so
> you don't get to read all these creative pitches like I do. I'm concerned
> that the number of bounced SPAM emails is approximately tripling with each
> wave of junk every 12-24 hours, so the trend is "going parabolic" on us.
>
> If anyone knows of a good method to deal with it (beyond forwarding them to
> the abuse department at each ISP, which is a losing battle in this case
> where
> multiple new sources keep springing up) please privately email me.
>
> As it could be serious enough to bring my shore.net account (and therefore
> MAPUG) down, I've taken the precaution of saving all your email addresses as
> currently subscribed to mapug and mapug-digest so that, worst case, I could
> change the name of the list and subscribe all of you to the new list.
> Perhaps
> shore.net could rename the list without unsubscribing/subscribing everyone,
> but I haven't checked that out yet.
>
> I don't know that anything this drastic will be necessary, but wanted to
> give
> you all advance notice just in case the list comes down for a few days.
> This
> is by far the most ominous series of SPAM attacks we've had so far, but
> don't
> worry, I'll be able to deal with it one way or another.
>
> On a separate note, newsgroups will have vastly more SPAM starting on April
> 3,
> due to a boycott by SPAM-canceling administrators who are feeling that more
> of
> the burden should be taken on by ISPs. The boycott has no effect upon
> MAPUG,
> but those of you following s.a.a. may soon be looking back on "the good old
> days" for a while too.
>
> John Hopper
> MAPUG administrator
--------------4F98049C0E538FDDD7AE16FE
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML>
<FONT SIZE=+2>DO NOT LISTEN TO THIS FOOL!</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1>Unk</FONT>
<P>Michael Hannigan wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>Why not just let them through and leave it up to
the end users to delete
<BR>them. It really is our responsibility, not yours, to deal with
the spam
<BR>that hits our mailboxes.
<P>-----Original Message-----
Behalf Of
<BR>JohnLX200
<BR>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 1998 11:13 PM
<BR>Subject: [M]: MAPUG admin: good news / bad news
<P>Some good news and some bad news:
<P>First, the good news: Thank you all for the civil tone on the list lately.
<BR>You are even forgiven for the excessive OT banter in exchange for the
good
<BR>behavior.
<P>Next, the bad news:
<P>Apparently mapug has found its way onto a serious SPAM mailing list.
It's
<BR>currently at a workable volume, but is rapidly accelerating, making
me
<BR>suspect
<BR>that we've made it onto some list of "57 million email addresses for
$99"
<BR>and
<BR>is being spread around. I don't believe it is a deliberate attack
upon the
<BR>list, just the usual get-rich-quick emails, porno website promotion,
etc.
<P>I'd use the Majordomo list server's capabilities to block it, if from
<BR>predictable addresses, but it's coming in from reasonable-looking addresses,
<BR>mostly but not all on AOL, and there are way too many MAPUG members
on AOL
<BR>for
<BR>me to just block email from AOL anyway. Not to mention that it
would block
<BR>ME
<BR>;-)
<P>Luckily, it all bounces to my shore.net account without hitting
the list,
<BR>so
<BR>you don't get to read all these creative pitches like I do. I'm
concerned
<BR>that the number of bounced SPAM emails is approximately tripling with
each
<BR>wave of junk every 12-24 hours, so the trend is "going parabolic" on
us.
<P>If anyone knows of a good method to deal with it (beyond forwarding
them to
<BR>the abuse department at each ISP, which is a losing battle in this
case
<BR>where
<BR>multiple new sources keep springing up) please privately email me.
<P>As it could be serious enough to bring my shore.net account (and therefore
<BR>MAPUG) down, I've taken the precaution of saving all your email addresses
as
<BR>currently subscribed to mapug and mapug-digest so that, worst case,
I could
<BR>change the name of the list and subscribe all of you to the new list.
<BR>Perhaps
<BR>shore.net could rename the list without unsubscribing/subscribing everyone,
<BR>but I haven't checked that out yet.
<P>I don't know that anything this drastic will be necessary, but wanted
to
<BR>give
<BR>you all advance notice just in case the list comes down for a few days.
<BR>This
<BR>is by far the most ominous series of SPAM attacks we've had so far,
but
<BR>don't
<BR>worry, I'll be able to deal with it one way or another.
<P>On a separate note, newsgroups will have vastly more SPAM starting on
April
<BR>3,
<BR>due to a boycott by SPAM-canceling administrators who are feeling that
more
<BR>of
<BR>the burden should be taken on by ISPs. The boycott has no effect
upon
<BR>MAPUG,
<BR>but those of you following s.a.a. may soon be looking back on "the
good old
<BR>days" for a while too.
<P>John Hopper
<BR>MAPUG administrator</BLOCKQUOTE>
</HTML>
--------------4F98049C0E538FDDD7AE16FE--
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: OT: Texas Observing Site, Andy Wallace
Next message: [M]: Re: RE: RE: RE: MAPUG admin: good news / bad news, Larry Wood
Next message in thread: [M]: Re: RE: RE: RE: MAPUG admin: good news / bad news, Larry Wood
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: MAPUG admin: good news / bad news, Bill Arnett
|
|