| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Probably due to the new automatic pre-scaling doing it's best to give
you an image - if you checked the pixel values you would likely see they
were all very low. I don't know why they bother with the pre-scaling,
it's never anywhere near correct in my experience, and you can't turn
the damn thing off. Much prefer to pre-set the pre-scaling manually
myself for current and all subsequent images.
Chris
>----------
>Sent: 08 April 1998 02:20
>Subject: [M]: Pictor 6.4
>
>I may have missed something along the way but I finally got around to playing
>with 6.4 Beta 3 last night - got the scsi to work fine, but the test images
>(lens cap on the 416) came through with a black background filled with white
>dots - like thermal noise; I shifted to Pictor 2.0 (also SCSI) and got a
>perfect black background.
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>Thanks,
>Kevin
>
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: RE: [M]: LX200 Dec Rebuild- Simulating Retrograde Motion, Michael Hart
Next message: Re: [M]: RE: Polar alignment, jp
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: Pictor 6.4, Don Dillinger
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Pictor 6.4, Jon Brewster
|
|