| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: [M]: ? about LX200 Wedge
From: Dan and Carol
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Wed Feb 14 19:58:34 2001
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
The superwedge is the way to go especially photographically speaking.
Bueno, Dan
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [M]: ? about LX200 Wedge
> Dont get the regular wedge, I made that mistake, it is *really* difficult
to adjust and polar alignment takes forever, and does not stay aligned.
> Cheers !!
> (anyone want to buy a standard wedge?)
> --
> Ivor Barker
> 10" LX 200
> ST-237
> 37 08 24 N
> 121 36 25 W
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ST-237
> http://www.employees.org/~ibarker/Astronomy
> Please take a look at my Messier Project (updated daily - almost)
> http://www.employees.org/~ibarker/Astronomy/Messier.html
>
> At 06:05 PM 2/14/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >I just picked up the 10" LX200 and wonder, is the regular Meade wedge
> >(advertised for the 8") compatible with the 10" base? Or do I have to
drop
> >$400 for the Superwedge instead of "only" $150 for the regular?
> >
> > --- John M. Burton
> >Tranquillity Base Today
> >http://members.aol.com/TranBaseDiorama/TBTodayList.htm
>
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: Re: Re: LX200 Hard Case, Dan and Carol
Next message: Re: [M]: RE: LX200 Hard Case, Leroy Guatney
Next message in thread: [M]: Re: ? about LX200 Wedge, bert katzung
Previous message in thread: [M]: RE: ? about LX200 Wedge, JOHN CLARK
|
|