Yes, I use the Televue Everbrite 2 inch diagonal and cannot see any obvious
difference to the Meade. Have compared the two on all kinds of objects and
if anything there maybe a very very slight difference on bright objects.

However if I had my time over again I would have stayed with the Meade
diagonal and spent my money on another accessory. Note that I have only
tested one Televue diagonal against one Meade diagonal. I do not know if
there would be any large variances between individual diagonals being
produced.

I originally talked to people who said that there was a large difference
and the my LX200 12" would be operating like a 10" without the everbrite
coatings ...

cheers
Dave

Dunedin
New Zealand


----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 7:19 AM
Subject: [M]: 2" Diagonals


> I have a 12" LX-200 . I am looking into obtaining more clarity of faint
> galaxies and nebulas. I have a JMI focuser. 12.5 type 4 Nagler and a 32mm
> superwide meade and the 26mm and 9mm. I have been looking at different 2"
> diagonals. Does anyone have any experience on say the Televue or Lumicon
> Diagonals? Thanks
>
> Bob Jr.
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


>
> ===============================================
>
> This e-mail is intended only for its addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by e-mail:
>
> ===============================================
>

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: RE:[M]: Re: 2" Diagonals, Email address hidden
Next message: RE: [M]: Light Polution Woes, Abalos Fernando-QSWI2011
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: 2" Diagonals, Leroy Guatney
Previous message in thread: [M]: Re: 2" Diagonals, Robert S. Greenstein, Esq.