>From an electronics (and computer interfacing) standpoint, my view would be
that Meade's LX200 electronics are second to none! I have been working with
a variety of electronic "goto" scopes and the LX200 is far superior in terms
of firmware reliability and general capabilities. (Mind you, my application
- satellite tracking is fairly unique and very demanding.)

Brent Boshart
http://sattracker.hypermart.net



>Alan Voetsch wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'd like to get some feedback on the subject of mounts. I use a 12"
>LX200.
> > Add to that a NGF-S, Taurus tracker, OM1, Meade counterweights, a
>Losmandy
> > dovetail plate that will soon be holding a TV-85 and you can see there's
>a
> > potential for trouble.
> >
> > So, I'm starting to look into replacing the mounting. Another of many
> > subjects I know little of. I know of the G-11,MI 250, AP900,1200... I'm
>sure
> > there are others.
> >
> > What I'd like to find out is: what are you using, how well does it work,
>how
> > happy are you with it...
> >
> > Any and all feedback appreciated
> > Alan
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
> > Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: Re: [M] : Flare at center of field with 8 inch f10 LX200 eyepiece projection, HENRY PFIZENMAYER
Next message: [M]: Re: Question about lifting an LX200, Jim McKay
Next message in thread: [M]: Re: Best mount for LX200, bert katzung
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Best mount for LX200, Michael Gregory