| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_007E_01C0AE20.9C649D80
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is slightly off topic as it's more of a general question.
Is there any advantage to using a 2-inch diagonal with just a 1.25-inch =
eyepiece?
(I'm asking because at this time I only own 1.25-inch eyepieces, but I =
have a 2-inch diagonal).
Thanks,
Paul Markov
Toronto, Canada
------=_NextPart_000_007E_01C0AE20.9C649D80
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>This is slightly off topic as it's more =
of a=20
general question.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is there any advantage to using a =
2-inch diagonal=20
with just a 1.25-inch eyepiece?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>(I'm asking because at this time I only =
own=20
1.25-inch eyepieces, but I have a 2-inch diagonal).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Paul Markov</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Toronto, =
Canada</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_007E_01C0AE20.9C649D80--
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: TV 9mm EP, Sauer, Christopher [IT]
Next message: [M]: TV 9mm EP, Sauer, Christopher [IT]
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: 2" vs 1.25" Diagonal, Nanz Family
|
|