| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
Get yourself a surplus quickcam and mount it in the
housing of your choice and you'll save allot of money
and get comparable results. I think my Qcam images are
as good as any made with the SAC acms.
For some work with a Quickcam VC check my page here
http://user.icx.net/~mfleenor/ccd/qcamvc/planets/Jupiter_08_2000.html
this cam can be had on ebay for ~20.00
Also check out my Qcam page here for work done with
the harder to find b&w Qcam.
http://user.icx.net/~mfleenor/qcam.htm
Mike
wrote:
> Just curious...
>
> Is the SAC-IVb CCD Imager worth buying?
>
> Here is a link that describes it
>
http://www.weasner.com/etx/showcase/saciv_ccd/sonfest.html
>
> Guillermo
> 33S 70W
>
_________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>
=====
Mike Fleenor
Fleenor Observatory
http://user.icx.net/~mfleenor/observatory/observatory_index.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Re: Comparison request - LX200 10" vs. 12", Email address hidden
Next message: [M]: Test, Brian Bond
Previous message in thread: [M]: Re: Good CCD camera?, Al
|
|