| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thread-next]
--part1_f9.94b1596.28117233_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 4/20/2001 12:32:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> I am curious if those of you who have done this would comment on the results
> experienced after the flocking. Did you notice an improvement in contrast
> and
> an absence of scattered light? Any tricks to flocking the inside of the
> tube
> or things I should watch out for? I will probably use the "rolled tube"
> technique for the inside of the baffle.
>
> Thanks,
>
I noticed a great improvement in overall contrast. I tried the baffle tube,
but, it cut off a portion of the light so I removed it.
Carl
--part1_f9.94b1596.28117233_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 4/20/2001 12:32:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I am curious if those of you who have done this would comment on the results
<BR>experienced after the flocking. Did you notice an improvement in contrast
<BR>and
<BR>an absence of scattered light? Any tricks to flocking the inside of the
<BR>tube
<BR>or things I should watch out for? I will probably use the "rolled tube"
<BR>technique for the inside of the baffle.
<BR>
<BR>Thanks,
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>I noticed a great improvement in overall contrast. I tried the baffle tube,
<BR>but, it cut off a portion of the light so I removed it.
<BR>
<BR>Carl</FONT></HTML>
--part1_f9.94b1596.28117233_boundary--
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: Re: mapug-digest V1 #3053, Michael A. Covington
Next message: RE: [M]: Flocking, Sauer, Christopher [IT]
Next message in thread: RE: [M]: Flocking, Sauer, Christopher [IT]
|
|