| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: [M]: RE: Re: Secondary Spinning
From: Rostoni, John
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Tue May 01 14:55:38 2001
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
-----Original Message-----
Subject: [M]: Re: Secondary Spinning
Anthony,
I also have an 8"LX200 and was out the other night collimating and
noticed that when I turned the hex wrench in one of the more stubborn
collimation screws, the secondary housing turned rather freely around
despite no movement by the corrector plate. I noticed that as I turned it
more counterclockwise it spun more freely and when spinning back clockwise
it tightened back up. I decided to tighten it as much as possible with my
hand and then recollimated from there. It was a strange experience but
surely not fatal to good collimation. I was able to readily get back to
perfect diffraction rings.
-----------snip---------------
This happened to my 10" as well...just about as you described. I called
Meade to determine what effect this might have and they suggested "sending
the scope in" for realignment. As the scope was long out of warrantee, I
decided to forgo the experience and try and return the secondary to it's
proper position.
I determined two factors here. First, the secondary should be centered. I
found that there was quite a bit of play - use some shims to make sure it
stays centered. I used some small thin plastic strips.
Secondly, Meade told me (after a lot of interrogation on my part), and the
rotational position is set to within 5 degrees when they do the alignment.
That is, they rotate the secondary by 5 degree increments until the image is
"optimized". The didn't tell me what that meant. Also, after alignment,
they do not put alignment marks on the secondary. I looked very closely at
the housing and the inside of the corrector hole, and found two matching
impressions that appeared to go together. I placed the corrector in the
hole at this point and tightened it up.
I have no idea if this was as critical as either I or Meade thought. The
images are fine, and everything is now tight and centered. I stopped
worrying about it a year or so ago.
Hope this helps,
John
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: 16" Meade OTA Specifications, Assaf Berwald
Next message: [M]: Starfinder drive problem, Paul Swinscoe
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: Secondary Spinning, Cliff PETERSON
Previous message in thread: [M]: Re: Secondary Spinning, Jim and Susan Williams
|
|