| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
Subject: [M]: Another 201XT Question
From: Paulo Cacella
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Sun May 06 03:15:10 2001
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
It seems that 201XT is focused. As I live in some open area with wide views
(20km open horizon) I could aim the telescope on a distant street light.
201XT is also almost parfocal with a standard 9mm Plossl 4000 from Meade.
The question here is that brilliance data changes wildly (ex: from 44 to
56) in each reading making focusing a challenge. The same happens with
stars (seeing was not so very bad...) Is it normal ?
Other strange thing is that seems that 201XT have some large delays in
readings. For example, if I cover the scope then only after, at least three
readings, I can get results of brilliance below 10. Then for each action on
focusing or moving the telescope it have delays in readings making the
thing almost impossible to use.
I´ve calibrated the unit and start guiding with readings like 00 and 01.
After some ten readings strange things happens. Suddenly readings of 90, 90
,90 and after 98, 98 etc... . Other strange thing is that the brilliance
value you obtain in FF mode (ex:90) is higher than in guide mode (in this
case 70).
All those things makes no much sense for me.
If someone have configuration data for a LX50 10" (calibration data,
exposure timesxstar mag) please let me know.
Paulo
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: Re: Re: Aligning with dial indicators and CCD and 35mm, Paul Hastings
Next message: [M]: test post, Paul Goelz
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Another 201XT Question, Alan Voetsch
|
|