| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: [M]: Re: Illuminated Reticles
From: Paul Luckas
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Thu May 17 22:49:09 2001
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_019B_01C0DFA1.5042FCF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Do you own a barlow ? If so, get the 12mm MA, and if you need the extra =
mag. throw in the Barl.
Cheers.
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Rick Wisniewski=20
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:28 PM
Subject: [M]: Illuminated Reticles
I am going to purchase an illuminated reticle for the purpose of more =
accurately aligning the scope during the alignment process. I have =
reviewed both of Meade's and can't decide between the 12mm MA and the =
9mm super plossl. I don't plan on doing any photography of any sorts. =
Either would probably serve the purpose well. I was just wondering if =
the 9mm with its micrometer adjustments was worth the extra cost. Is =
the 12mm MA, even though lesser quality, an eye piece that would allow =
for quite accurate star alignments?
Thanks,
Rick Wisniewski, Vancouver, WA
(where we've not had a decent nights viewing for about 2 months now!)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
------=_NextPart_000_019B_01C0DFA1.5042FCF0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4613.1700" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Do you own a barlow ? If so, get =
the 12mm MA,=20
and if you need the extra mag. throw in the Barl.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Cheers.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
Wisniewski</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, May 18, 2001 =
12:28 PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [M]: Illuminated =
Reticles</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>I am going to purchase an illuminated reticle for the purpose of =
more=20
accurately aligning the scope during the alignment process. I =
have=20
reviewed both of Meade's and can't decide between the 12mm MA and the =
9mm=20
super plossl. I don't plan on doing any photography of any=20
sorts. Either would probably serve the purpose well. =
I was=20
just wondering if the 9mm with its micrometer adjustments was worth =
the extra=20
cost. Is the 12mm MA, even though lesser quality, an eye =
piece that=20
would allow for quite accurate star alignments?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV>Rick Wisniewski, Vancouver, WA</DIV>
<DIV>(where we've not had a decent nights viewing for about 2 months=20
now!)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV><BR clear=3Dall>
<HR>
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <A=20
href=3D"http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</A><BR>
<P></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_019B_01C0DFA1.5042FCF0--
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: RE: Re: Illuminated Reticles, Stan Rife
Next message: [M]: LX 200: RA drive swings 2.5 minutes with lock engaged, Aditya Damodaran
Next message in thread: [M]: Re: RE: Re: Illuminated Reticles, Al
Previous message in thread: [M]: RE: Re: Illuminated Reticles, Stan Rife
|
|