Astronomy Site: Meade Advanced Products Users Group Archive: [M]: Re: RE: Re: Illuminated Reticles


 

  [index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]
 
Subject: [M]: Re: RE: Re: Illuminated Reticles
From: Al
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Fri May 18 03:45:21 2001

While you're here, how about checking out the Astronomy Book List ?

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C0DF66.1C1D14A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

When you add up all the cords hanging off the back of your telescope =
during a CCD session, one less cord is appreciated. Moreover, a =
self-contained power source appears to be more reliable than another =
cord plugged into your console.

Al
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Stan Rife=20
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:48 AM
Subject: [M]: RE: Re: Illuminated Reticles


I too am planning to get an illuminated reticle eyepiece, but I =
plan to use it for imaging as well as for precise alignment of stars. I =
am curious why you recommend the cordless model, specifically. I assumed =
that the corded model would be more reliable running off of the control =
panel power, as well as having the ability to control the brightness and =
pulsing from the hand controller. Does the cord become a problem while =
slewing around the sky?=20

Stan Rife
Houston, TX



-----Original Message-----
Of Al
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:46 PM
Subject: [M]: Re: Illuminated Reticles


If you're not going to use the ep for guiding, the least expensive =
one should be good enough. IMO, the important feature in an illuminated =
reticle is that it should be cordless. If you can afford this feature, =
get it.

Al
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Rick Wisniewski=20
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:28 AM
Subject: [M]: Illuminated Reticles


I am going to purchase an illuminated reticle for the purpose of =
more accurately aligning the scope during the alignment process. I have =
reviewed both of Meade's and can't decide between the 12mm MA and the =
9mm super plossl. I don't plan on doing any photography of any sorts. =
Either would probably serve the purpose well. I was just wondering if =
the 9mm with its micrometer adjustments was worth the extra cost. Is =
the 12mm MA, even though lesser quality, an eye piece that would allow =
for quite accurate star alignments?

Thanks,
Rick Wisniewski, Vancouver, WA
(where we've not had a decent nights viewing for about 2 months =
now!)




-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C0DF66.1C1D14A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.100" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>When you add up all the cords hanging off the back =
of your=20
telescope during a CCD session, one less cord is appreciated.&nbsp; =
Moreover, a=20
self-contained power source appears to be more reliable than another =
cord=20
plugged into your console.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Al</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
Rife</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, May 18, 2001 1:48 =
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [M]: RE: Re: =
Illuminated=20
Reticles</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D290273605-18052001><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
I too am planning to get an illuminated reticle eyepiece, but I plan =
to use it=20
for imaging as well as for precise alignment of stars. I am curious =
why you=20
recommend the cordless model, specifically. I assumed that the corded =
model=20
would be more reliable running off of the control panel power, as well =
as=20
having the ability to control&nbsp;the brightness and pulsing from the =
hand=20
controller.&nbsp;Does the cord become a problem while slewing around =
the=20
sky?&nbsp;</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Stan Rife<BR>Houston,=20
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> =

Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:46 PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
Reticles<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>If you're not going to use the ep for guiding, =
the least=20
expensive one should be&nbsp;good enough.&nbsp; IMO, the important =
feature=20
in an illuminated reticle is that it should be cordless.&nbsp; If =
you can=20
afford this feature, get it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Al</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
Wisniewski</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, May 18, 2001 =
12:28=20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [M]: Illuminated=20
Reticles</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>I am going to purchase an illuminated reticle for the purpose =
of more=20
accurately aligning the scope during the alignment process.&nbsp; =
I have=20
reviewed both of Meade's and can't decide between the 12mm MA and =
the 9mm=20
super plossl.&nbsp; I don't plan on doing any photography of any=20
sorts.&nbsp;&nbsp;Either would probably serve the purpose =
well.&nbsp; I=20
was just wondering if the 9mm with its micrometer adjustments was =
worth=20
the extra cost.&nbsp; Is the 12mm MA, even though lesser quality,=20
an&nbsp;eye piece that would allow for quite accurate star=20
alignments?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV>Rick Wisniewski, Vancouver, WA</DIV>
<DIV>(where we've not had a decent nights viewing for about 2 =
months=20
now!)</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></DIV><BR clear=3Dall>
<HR>
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <A=20
href=3D"http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</A><BR>
<P></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C0DF66.1C1D14A0--


View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: LX 200: RA drive swings 2.5 minutes with lock engaged, Aditya Damodaran
Next message: [M]: RE: Re: RE: Re: Illuminated Reticles, William D. Carroll
Next message in thread: [M]: RE: Re: RE: Re: Illuminated Reticles, William D. Carroll
Previous message in thread: [M]: Re: Illuminated Reticles, Paul Luckas


  [AstronomySite] Return to the www.AstronomySite.com home page
  [ShareWareEtc] Looking for great shareware? Then try Shareware Etcetera
  [Newsgroup Info] Want to learn more about how internet newsgroups and newsgroup downloaders work?
  [Astronomy Book List] Great prices and a great selection on astronomy books!