| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: [M]: RE: RE: Calculating CCD Pixel Size
From: Bill Arnett
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Sun May 20 00:49:06 2001
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
On Sunday, May 20, 2001, at 12:14 AM, Micahel McNeil wrote:
> Bill, you will find CMOS CCD's are very poor for astronomy. maybe some
> planetary, but not much else. This has been well discussed on several
> CCD pro groups. 73, Mike
That's interesting; I didn't know that. Can you give a brief synopsis
of the issue?
But CMOS vs CCD has nothing to do with my original question about how to
count pixels. All one-shot color imagers are alike in this respect,
arent' they?
--
Bill Arnett
http://nineplanets.org/ 37 27 38 N 122 16 11 W
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: Repair of LX200, John Teel
Next message: Re: [M]: RE: RE: Calculating CCD Pixel Size, Micahel McNeil
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: RE: RE: Calculating CCD Pixel Size, Micahel McNeil
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: RE: RE: Calculating CCD Pixel Size, Micahel McNeil
|
|