| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: [M]: RE: Re: [M] LX200 align/slew
From: LaGuardia, Kristofer S.
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Fri Jun 01 10:13:51 2001
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0EABE.3AEA8DF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Thank you for the information, and recommendations! Hmm...now I wonder what
site and book you would be referring to? ;) Hehe
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:41 AM
Subject: [M]: Re: [M] LX200 align/slew
> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:08:40 -0600
> Subject: [M]: LX200 align/slew
>
> Last night I did a 1-star alt-az alignment with Vega. My base was
level...I
> had used my reticule eyepiece to center the star. I slewed to some stars
> and was off some...not sure how much since I'm still new to this...
1-star alignment is inherently inaccurate and very much at the mercy of
leveling and site data. Do a 2-star alignment and you'll be pleasantly
surprised. In my opinion, it was a mistake for them to even offer 1-star
alignment -- it is a flawed concept. Two stars are necessary (and
sufficient) to determine the position of the celestial sphere.
> 1) In AltAz mode, does the LX200 track...or automatically slew the scope
to
> keep up with the object being viewed?
Yes, automatically. This is activated as soon as you do your alignment on 1
or 2 stars.
> 2) If it does do that, then why use the wedge(I have the Meade
Superwedge)?
To avoid field rotation in long-exposure photographs; also to get somewhat
smoother tracking and use periodic error correction (significant for
photography, not for visual use). In alt-azimuth mode, the image twists
gradually as it tracks because the telescope isn't rotating around the same
axis as the Earth.
The other reason to use the wedge is if you are measuring double stars or
something and need your four slewing directions to be exactly north, south,
east, and west regardless of position in the sky.
> i guess I'm getting tired of having to follow the moon with the
keypad...and
> the stars...or finding a binary pair and running in to get the wife out
only
> to have to find it again.
Tracking the Moon is inherently complicated because there's parallax as well
as orbital motion. Few if any telescopes track it perfectly.
> Plus, I'm getting pretty confident with my camera
> enough to want to take photos ...
Let me suggest a book and a web site :)
Clear skies,
Michael Covington
Author, Astrophotography for the Amateur
(Now working on a book on computerized telescopes)
http://www.CovingtonInnovations.com/astro <><
[Astronomy correspondents: Please do not send pictures or
file attachments unless requested. They will not reach me. ]
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0EABE.3AEA8DF0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: Re: [M] LX200 align/slew</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Thank you for the information, and =
recommendations! Hmm...now I wonder what site and book you =
would be referring to? ;) Hehe</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: Michael A. Covington [<A =
nInnovations.com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:41 AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: [M]: Re: [M] LX200 align/slew</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:08:40 -0600</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> From: "LaGuardia, Kristofer S." =
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Subject: [M]: LX200 align/slew</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Last night I did a 1-star alt-az alignment with =
Vega. My base was</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>level...I</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> had used my reticule eyepiece to center the =
star. I slewed to some stars</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> and was off some...not sure how much since I'm =
still new to this...</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>1-star alignment is inherently inaccurate and very =
much at the mercy of</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>leveling and site data. Do a 2-star alignment =
and you'll be pleasantly</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>surprised. In my opinion, it was a mistake for =
them to even offer 1-star</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>alignment -- it is a flawed concept. Two stars =
are necessary (and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>sufficient) to determine the position of the =
celestial sphere.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> 1) In AltAz mode, does the LX200 track...or =
automatically slew the scope</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> keep up with the object being viewed?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Yes, automatically. This is activated as soon =
as you do your alignment on 1</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>or 2 stars.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> 2) If it does do that, then why use the wedge(I =
have the Meade</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Superwedge)?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>To avoid field rotation in long-exposure photographs; =
also to get somewhat</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>smoother tracking and use periodic error correction =
(significant for</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>photography, not for visual use). In =
alt-azimuth mode, the image twists</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>gradually as it tracks because the telescope isn't =
rotating around the same</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>axis as the Earth.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The other reason to use the wedge is if you are =
measuring double stars or</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>something and need your four slewing directions to =
be exactly north, south,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>east, and west regardless of position in the =
sky.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> i guess I'm getting tired of having to follow =
the moon with the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>keypad...and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> the stars...or finding a binary pair and =
running in to get the wife out</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>only</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> to have to find it again.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Tracking the Moon is inherently complicated because =
there's parallax as well</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>as orbital motion. Few if any telescopes track =
it perfectly.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Plus, I'm getting pretty confident with my =
camera</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> enough to want to take photos ...</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Let me suggest a book and a web site :)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Clear skies,</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Michael Covington</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Author, Astrophotography for the Amateur</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>(Now working on a book on computerized =
telescopes)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2><A =
HREF=3D"http://www.CovingtonInnovations.com/astro" =
TARGET=3D"_blank">http://www.CovingtonInnovations.com/astro</A> =
<><</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>[Astronomy correspondents: Please do not send =
pictures or</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>file attachments unless requested. They will =
not reach me. ]</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0EABE.3AEA8DF0--
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: LX200 align/slew, John Teel
Next message: [M]: RE: OT: Dec motor failures, Anthony J. Kroes
Next message in thread: [M]: Re: [M] LX200 align/slew, Kevin Wigell
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: LX200 align/slew, John Teel
|
|