Kevin,
The time and location are entered so the LX200 can
update for the location of the planets. If this is
wrong I'm also sure someone will let me know.

Barre
> Michael Covington wrote:
> <<1-star alignment is inherently inaccurate and very
> much at the mercy of
> leveling and site data. Do a 2-star alignment and
> you'll be pleasantly
> surprised. In my opinion, it was a mistake for them
> to even offer 1-star
> alignment -- it is a flawed concept. Two stars are
> necessary (and
> sufficient) to determine the position of the
> celestial sphere.>>
>
> Michael, I'm curious why you think the 1-star
> alignment should not have been
> offered. I always use the 2-star alignment before I
> begin an observing
> session, but there are times when I find the 1-star
> handy. For example, two
> nights ago I was setting up in bright twilight and I
> wanted to do a 2-star
> alignment on Arcturus and Pollux. Arcturus was easy,
> being high in the east,
> but Pollux was lost in the bright western twilight.
> So I did a quick 1-star
> alignment on Arcturus, then did a GoTo to Pollux.
> One look through the
> finder allowed me to find Pollux easily, then I did
> my 2-star alignment on
> Pollux, then Arcturus. I know I probably could have
> found another star
> besides Pollux to do the 2-star alignment, or just
> waited until it was
> darker, but the 1-star procedure sure made things
> simpler for me.
>
> OK, maybe that's not an overriding reason for
> offering 1-star alignment, but
> I can think of several other examples where it would
> come in handy.
>
> Why do you think the 1-star alignment is so flawed
> that it shouldn't be
> offered?
>
> On a slightly different topic, there have been many
> posts lately about
> getting the time and location correct in order to
> ensure accurate slewing.
> You've said it before, but apparently many missed
> it. Time and location
> entry in the LX-200 brains have NOTHING to do with
> accurate slewing, once
> you've done a good 2-star alignment. I haven't tried
> it myself, but I
> believe you can enter any time, date, and location
> that you want, and once
> you do a 2-star alignment, you should still be able
> to accurately slew.
> There are only two problems with this that I can
> think of: (1) The computer
> may tell you than an object is below the horizon
> when it is not, and (2)
> slewing to planets or the moon may not be correct.
> But for all deep sky
> objects, time and location should have NO EFFECT on
> accurate slewing. So
> look elsewhere for the source of your problem if
> your slewing is not
> accurate.
>
> If I'm wrong about the above, I'm very sure someone
> will correct me.
>
> Clear skies,
> Kevin Wigell
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Freq settings for lx200 , Taras R. Hnatyshyn
Next message: [M]: Re: 20mm Erfle - University Optics, Paul Luckas
Next message in thread: [M]: Re: RE: Re: [M] LX200 align/slew, Roy Gillard
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Re: [M] LX200 align/slew, Michael J. Cook