| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: [M]: Tracking switch
From: Taras R. Hnatyshyn
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Tue Jun 12 22:47:05 2001
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
These guys near the equator have the opposite problem from us higher
latitude folks. We worry about our flip-mirrors, focusers, OAG's,
CCDs/camera bodies striking the base of the scope. They have to worry
about the dew cap hitting the base of the scope. And since the pole
stars are so near the horizon, they probably need to drift align
without being able to use the poles as an accurate starting point
due to refraction. And you thought we had it tough...
Taras
On Tuesday, June 12, 2001, at 10:55 PM, mapug-digest wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:41:59 +0800
> Subject: Re: [M]: Tracking switch
>
> Good question Doug. In fact it reinforces my theory that - from a
> mechani=
> cal
> perspective - living on the North or South pole is definitely
> preferable.
>
> Seriously though, there's a chap in Malaysia (recently posted some
> photos
> here - or maybe SBIG, can't remember) who being at about 3 degrees
> north =
> has
> that issue to contend with. From memory he uses a [modified?] Milburn,
> an=
> d
> has produced some nice long exposure astro photos.
>
>
>
> - ----- Original Message -----
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [M]: Tracking switch
>
>
> would anyone want to subject the RA base of their 12" to the sort of
> side
> loading an equatorial position would give it ?
>
> Doug I
> At 08:12 12/06/01 -0400, you wrote:
>> If you are exactly on the equator, then you will be setting up the
>> base of the scope vertically, and it will be up to you whether you
>> align on the North or South Poles. You would use the setting based
>> on which hemisphere you are pointing the scope. The set up would
>> limit the targets in the other hemisphere, because the base would
>> be in the way.
>>
>> Taras
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 12, 2001, at 04:58 PM, mapug-digest wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:25:04 -0400
>>> Subject: [M]: Tracking switch
>>>
>>> This is just an academic question, it is trivial but I am just
>>> curious.
>>> If you set up the LX200 precisly on the equator which way do you set
>>> th=
> e
>>> N/S switch?
--
<end of message>
********************************************************************
* http://members.bellatlantic.net/~tarashna/welcome.html *
* 73°59'18.4"W 40°43'37.2"N or 74°25'24.4"W 41°40'42.0"N *
********************************************************************
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: RE: Dampness, Steve Brown
Next message: Re: [M]: Re: Sporadic "runaway DEC", Paul Goelz
Next message in thread: RE: [M]: Tracking switch, Abalos Fernando-QSWI2011
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Tracking switch, R. A. Greiner
|
|