I have a 12" that I keep in a closet. I strap the tube (in original padded
shipping case) to a heavy-duty dolly and cart it out for field setups
regularly. You do need to be, um, "sturdy", to cart it around in this
fashion(not to mention placing the OTA on the tripod), though. A GPS field
unit also helps tremendously when being nomadic with an auto scope.

Joe

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:10 PM
Subject: [M]: 12" LX200 (vs 11" Celestron) and other stuff




I hope I'm using the right list for these questions. I'm a Celestron 8"
PEC owner
and I want to upgrade to a larger aperture telescope so I'm considering a
Meade 10" / 12" or a Celestron 11". I have a couple of questions and I've
seen
similar questions on this list so hopefully this ok. My main application
is going to
be spectroscopy.

1) Is the 12" really a portable instrument ? I know it's large, but how
many of you really
move it outside and bring it back in when you're done ? I think my
wife would shoot me
if I said I wanted to permanently mount (at least right now)

2) Considering the Meade vs a Celestron. It seems any software out there I
see says
it works with a Meade LX200 telescope, but nothing about Celestrons.
Is the Meade
just support more than Celestron (or the de-facto standard) ?

Again, sorry if this isn't appropriate for the list, if you feel it isn't
and want to send me mail
offline, that's fine (and would be appreciated).

Matt Ganis

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------

Matt Ganis - (914) 784-5759
17 Skyline Dr.. - office J2-F22
Hawthorne, NY 10532

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: RE: Image process challenge, Anthony J. Kroes
Next message: [M]: Orion 120V dew heater, Chris Frye
Next message in thread: [M]: RE: Re: 12" LX200 (vs 11" Celestron) and other stuff, George & Sarah Jean Cooper
Previous message in thread: [M]: RE: 12" LX200 (vs 11" Celestron) and other stuff, Email address hidden