Wrong comparison. You should compare the LX-200 to a PC computer. If you
know of a brand that never has troubles, or software that never has
troubles, please let me know! :)

Andy

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 7:14 PM
Subject: [M]: Mead quality control!!!


>
> There seems to be very little said about the good things Meade telescopes
do
> for us.
> Is this due to a enjoyment of problems or is this an indication that Meade
> should get a wake up call.
> If any of you bought a new car and after a few weeks found that the
> electronics had started to fail I bet you my last
> pound that you would run to the dealer demanding repair or replacement. If
> you were told that the only way to remedy the electrical problem was to
pack
> the car up and send it back to the factory that made it for repair I bet
> most of us would emit a string of four letter words long enough to reach
the
> factory.
> But it would seem that when it comes to our telescopes that we may pay
many
> thousands of £ / $ for we sit back and
> accept the most mind blowingly bad quality control and after sales service
> on the face of the Earth.
> Come on people stand up for your selfs, start demanding that the dealers
> that sold these things to you correct the problem, and if the scope needs
to
> go back to Meade make the poblem either Meads responsability or the
dealers.
> No more of the $190 for this and $400 for that BS, Meade should replace
> defective parts at there own cost and inconvenience.
> Doing this may prompt them to employ a few well trained QC engineers,,,,
> Well Im off to tow my car the 300 miles to the factory for a new wiper
> motor..
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
>

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: Re: Mead quality control!!!, Andy Wallace
Next message: [M]: Re: Mead quality control!!!- , Mr Kevin Gambrell
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: Re: Mead quality control!!!, Email address hidden
Previous message in thread: [M]: Re: Mead quality control!!!, Andy Wallace