The LX50 is a great visual scope, but if you want to do photography of
any sort the benefits of the LX200 will be of advantage to you. If you
have the cash go for the LX200 anyway, you will not regret it.

Chris

>----------
>From:
>Sent: 20 April 1998 08:58
>Subject: [M]: LX50 vs LX200
>
> Hi all,
>I looking forward to buy a telescope. My choice is nearly made but a need a
>couple of advice. In fact, I hesitate between two models:
>meade 8"LX50 and meade 8"LX200.
> What are the main differences between these model ? As I dont need a
>go-to fonctionality, what are the advantages of LX200 in front of the LX50?.
>And last question about autoguiding: does the autoguiding with the LX50 is
>as accurate as the autoguiding with LX200?
>
> Thanks,
> Guillaume
>
>
>

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: LX50 vs LX200, Guillaume Dubos
Next message: [M]: Re: LX200 Finding Accuracy Debate, Bob Freeze
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: RE: LX50 vs LX200, Clint
Previous message in thread: [M]: LX50 vs LX200, Guillaume Dubos