| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C11A96.17D7A6B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
I wouldn't be too concerned about "square wave" "sine wave" issues. Most DC
to AC convertors use transistors to switch the DC current into inductive
loads which result in pretty poor square waves that are relatively low in
harmonics. That being said, most any load such as a
transformer/rectifier/filter will integrate most of the remaining AC wave.
This means switching or sine wave convertors are satisfactory for our
application.
Bill Boyd
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [M]: Battery Problems
I have been thinking , a lowpass filter should pretty much change the
"modified square wave" back into something a lot more like a sine wave
by reducing the higher order harmonics found in the square wave ...
those harmonics are also what probably causes the most noise and
other related problems... .. I will mull that over a bit more ... not
sure what to do about varying load impedances but can design one and
then see what effect of varying load impedances on harmonic
suppression might be ( or Doc G probably already knows ) ..
In fact the Meade Ac supply is somewhat of a low pass filter .. the
main issue is probably what goes on with the transformer , how it
likes the harmonics and whether they get thru to the rectifier diodes
to increase the peak inverse voltage the diodes see., or what leaks
around the diodes and filter capacitor.
Rgds... Hank
-----Original Message-----
Date: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 3:40 PM
Subject: RE: [M]: Battery Problems
>Chris--
>
>Thanks for your reply. I think that I am willing to risk running my
DC
>components--laptop and telescope--off a modified square wave
inverter,
>rather than spend that much.
>
>As for the "750 amps" for the marine battery, my battery is rated
650, and
>it is a 75 amp-hour battery. Presumably, the 750 would be about 85
>amp-hours. However, I am learning (I make every mistake once) that
marine
>batteries rated in cranking amps are not really pure deep cycle
batteries,
>but, rather, are hybrids, so I don't expect this battery to last all
that
>long being totally run down in a night's imaging. Next time, I will
look
>harder for a pure deep cycle battery, and I will try to get one at
least 100
>amp-hours.
>
>--Mark
>
>> -----Original Message-----
Of
>> Chris Frye
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 2:01 PM
>> To: LX200 User's Group
>> Subject: [M]: RE: Battery Problems
>>
>>
>> Mark de Regt wrote:
>>
>> >Chris--
>>
>> >I also use a large marine deep cycle battery and a charger. I
could
>> not
>> >find a true sine wave inverter without spending hundreds of
dollars for
>> one;
>> >I use a modified square wave 350 watt inverter. If you spent a
>> reasonable
>> >amount (as opposed to an unreasonable amount) on yours, I would be
>> >interested where you got it.
>>
>> >- --Mark
>>
>> My reply:
>>
>> I can research this further, if you want, but I think I bought it
from
>> one of the
>> dozens of new and used electronic supply catalogs I receive every
month.
>>
>> I paid $525.00 for it. In my case I think that the price was a
sound
>> investment
>> to protect a $3,195.00 telescope (10" LX200 with only 1 eyepiece)
:). I
>> also use
>> the inverter in my home laboratory on circuits that contain
inductors.
>> These
>> circuits will haywire with anything other than a true sine wave.
>>
>> I hope this helped.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C11A96.17D7A6B0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: [M]: Battery Problems</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I wouldn't be too concerned about "square =
wave" "sine wave" issues. Most DC to AC convertors use =
transistors to switch the DC current into inductive loads which result =
in pretty poor square waves that are relatively low in harmonics. That =
being said, most any load such as a transformer/rectifier/filter will =
integrate most of the remaining AC wave. This means switching or sine =
wave convertors are satisfactory for our application.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Bill Boyd</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: HENRY PFIZENMAYER [<A =
.att.net</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:03 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: Re: [M]: Battery Problems</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I have been thinking , a lowpass filter should pretty =
much change the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>"modified square wave" back into something =
a lot more like a sine wave</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>by reducing the higher order harmonics found in the =
square wave ...</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>those harmonics are also what probably causes the =
most noise and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>other related problems... .. I will mull that over a =
bit more ... not</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>sure what to do about varying load impedances but =
can design one and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>then see what effect of varying load impedances on =
harmonic</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>suppression might be ( or Doc G probably already =
knows ) ..</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>In fact the Meade Ac supply is somewhat of a =
low pass filter .. the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>main issue is probably what goes on with the =
transformer , how it</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>likes the harmonics and whether they get thru to the =
rectifier diodes</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>to increase the peak inverse voltage the diodes =
see., or what leaks</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>around the diodes and filter capacitor.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Rgds... Hank</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Date: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 3:40 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: RE: [M]: Battery Problems</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>>Chris--</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>Thanks for your reply. I think that I am =
willing to risk running my</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>DC</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>components--laptop and telescope--off a modified =
square wave</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>inverter,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>rather than spend that much.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>As for the "750 amps" for the marine =
battery, my battery is rated</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>650, and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>it is a 75 amp-hour battery. Presumably, =
the 750 would be about 85</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>amp-hours. However, I am learning (I make =
every mistake once) that</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>marine</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>batteries rated in cranking amps are not really =
pure deep cycle</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>batteries,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>but, rather, are hybrids, so I don't expect this =
battery to last all</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>that</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>long being totally run down in a night's =
imaging. Next time, I will</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>look</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>harder for a pure deep cycle battery, and I will =
try to get one at</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>least 100</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>amp-hours.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>--Mark</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> -----Original Message-----</FONT>
n Behalf</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Of</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> Chris Frye</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 2:01 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> To: LX200 User's Group</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> Subject: [M]: RE: Battery Problems</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> Mark de Regt wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> >Chris--</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> >I also use a large marine deep cycle =
battery and a charger. I</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>could</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> not</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> >find a true sine wave inverter without =
spending hundreds of</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>dollars for</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> one;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> >I use a modified square wave 350 watt =
inverter. If you spent a</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> reasonable</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> >amount (as opposed to an unreasonable =
amount) on yours, I would be</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> >interested where you got it.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> >- --Mark</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> My reply:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> I can research this further, if you =
want, but I think I bought it</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>from</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> one of the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> dozens of new and used electronic supply =
catalogs I receive every</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>month.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> I paid $525.00 for it. In my case I =
think that the price was a</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>sound</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> investment</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> to protect a $3,195.00 telescope (10" =
LX200 with only 1 eyepiece)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>:). I</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> also use</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> the inverter in my home laboratory on =
circuits that contain</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>inductors.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> These</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> circuits will haywire with anything other =
than a true sine wave.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>> I hope this helped.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>></FONT>
</P>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C11A96.17D7A6B0--
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Meade Pricew, Email address hidden
Next message: [M]: RE: Re: Meade Price Drop, Tom &/or Elizabeth Skinner
Next message in thread: RE: [M]: Battery Problems, Philip Peake
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Battery Problems, HENRY PFIZENMAYER
|
|