| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
Subject: Re: [M]: Increasing contrast in an SCT (long)
From: Peter Narkauskas
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Sat Apr 10 17:30:19 2004
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
At 22:43 08-04-04 -0700, you wrote:
>That may be true for a "properly baffled SCT" but that does not include
>Meades :-( But there's no need to take any of this on authority.
>Just point your LX near the bright limb of the Moon, remove the
>eyepiece and look up the tube. You won't like what you see. Any of
>the flocking methods described on this thread will make a dramatic
>improvement.
>
>--
>Bill Arnett
>Emerald Hills CA USA 37 27 N 122 15 W
I will give that a try Bill and see for myself. When I quoted Dr Clay, I
was not for or against flocking....just presenting another opinion.
Myself...I have no idea what to believe! It has been an interesting thread
though. I have seen this idea of flocking come up on various astro groups
often and with the same for and against arguments.
Cheers,
peter
birregurra...australia
Astro pics: http://home.pacific.net.au/~wunili/
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: [M]: Flocking Paper, oscar
Next message: [M]: 201 XT problem, Blair MacDonald
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: Increasing contrast in an SCT (long), Chris S
|
|