| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thread-next]
Subject: [M]: Re: [LX200GPS] Re: To Flock or Not to Flock.
From: Ernest Martsching
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Fri Jan 28 09:01:24 2005
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
Now this is an interesting notion.
Nobody had mentioned this in any posting on flocking.
I'd like to ask the rest of the group, "Would I get the same level of
increased contrast by flocking just the inside of the dew shield as I would
by flocking the inside of the scope?"
If it did, that would be great!
I always use my dew shield anyway.
I want to thank all of those that took the time to respond both in the
LX200GPS newsgroup and the Mapug newsgroup.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 4:50 AM
Subject: [LX200GPS] Re: To Flock or Not to Flock.
>
>
>
> I think you would get most of the benefits of flocking just by using
> a good dew shield like an Astrozap, that has the felt lining on the
> inside. Not much in the way of reflected light gets past that baby.
> - Rick
>
>
> >
> >
> > I have no experience with the stuff myself, but here's a web site
> > that gives instructions on flocking the inside of a Newtonian
> scope,
> > along with a reference for the flocking material.
> > http://www.catseyecollimation.com/velvproc.html
> >
> > Daniel Johnson
> >
> > >
> > > I don't normally cross-post, however I think the topic is
> > appropriate for both groups.
> > > I've read quite a bit about flocking and I was hoping that there
> > was someone out there that had flocked a 10" LX200GPS with the
> UHTC.
> > > I have a few questions that if you wish, you may reply to my
> home e-
> > mail account.
> > > 1. Was there a significant difference in contrast after flocking?
> > > 2. Can this difference be demonstrated via before and after
> > photographs?
> > > 3. Is there a local source of flocking paper available such as
> > craft stores? (The price seems a bit high when I look for
> flocking
> > paper from astronomical sources.)
> > > 4. Is there a difference in removing the primary mirror back on
> the
> > GPS model compared to the previous models as described on the
> MAPUG
> > site?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
> Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
> Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/RzSHvD/UOnJAA/79vVAA/2.XolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LX200GPS/
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: comparitor adjustment again, Email address hidden
Next message: [M]: Re: [LX200GPS] Re: To Flock or Not to Flock., peter erdman
Next message in thread: [M]: Re: [LX200GPS] Re: To Flock or Not to Flock., peter erdman
|
|