| |
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: [M]: 9mm Nagler on 10" LX200 (F/10)
From: George S. Anderson
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Sun Jul 19 07:41:34 1998
|
While you're here, how about checking out the
Astronomy Book
List ? |
At 02:20 PM 7/18/1998 -0500, you wrote:
>With Jupiter up early enough in the evening that I was able to be awake, not
>have dew attack my scope, etc etc, I was able to see it for the first time
>through my 10" LX200.
>
>My question is, I was unable to get my 9mm Nagler to focus completely on it.
>I was able to see it and the Galliean satellites easily with the 35mm
>Panoptic, 22mm Panoptic, and 16mm Nagler just fine. I just could not get
>full focus on the 9mm Nagler.
>
I used a 8.8 inch wide angle Meade on my 12" LX200 the last two nights. It
would not focus right until after Jupiter was well above the horizon, after
that it got better and better and I watch one of the moons come out from
behind the planet. In order to see more detail, some of my friends from
the KAO star club held various colored filters up to it, and the was
interesting.
At this point of your message I would guess it was the atmosphere causing
your problems.
>I am using a TV 2" Diagonal, with the TV SCT to 2" Adapter. I tried lifting
>the eyepiece out of the diag a bit and focusing best that way and then
>focusing the scope itself, to no avail.
>
>I tried the 9mm RET eyepiece I have and was able to get it to focus, not to
>the sharpness I wanted but I blamed that to the fact that Jupiter was low in
>the air and it was humid. You turn on a flash light and aim it up the beam
>illuminates the crap in the air.
>
If the 9mm RET does focus, I would have waited a little longer and tried
the Nagler again. Since it has more pieces of glass, it is probably more
sensitive to problems than the RET. But I would stay up over night on some
fairly good night check it out, again.
>Has anyone had a 9mm Nagler on a 10" LX200 (F/10) and gotten it to focus?
>The reason I ask is since I got it a few months ago the base of the eyepiece
>is always loose, and I have to 'screw' it back on to tighten it up, and I'm
>wondering if the eyepiece may have a problem.
Oh, yeh, mine unscrews a lot also. I don't think that is a problem, if it
does not come completely unscrewed (In which case the glass will all come
falling out). Just tighten it up.
>
>Thanks
>
>
>Tom Boucher
Hope it turns out to be just the atmosphere. I live in Kansas and the
humidity is pretty bad here. Not to mention the farmers all burn there
fields this time of year.
Allrightythen,
http://homepage.netspaceonline.com/~yudhi/
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: [M] : Fine-adjustment of tripod (was "busted bubble, Fred Park
Next message: Re: [M]: 9mm Nagler on 10" LX200 (F/10), Tom Boucher
Next message in thread: Re: [M]: 9mm Nagler on 10" LX200 (F/10), Tom Boucher
Previous message in thread: Re: [M]: 9mm Nagler on 10" LX200 (F/10), Bobby Middleton
|
|