Sponsored By:

[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thread-next]

Subject: (no subject)
From: Brandon Jones
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Wed Oct 18 06:55:07 1995

> To: mapug@shore.net
> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 10:39:20
> Subject: Re:
> From: Graham Adams <gpa@diaspar.win-uk.net>
> Reply-to: mapug@shore.net

>
> > I am tired of using a hairdryer to remove dew from my corrector
> >only to have it return a short while later. I have held off from buying any
> >of the dew preventative devices that are available. The Kendrick system
> >seems to be a bit of overkill; although I have never heard anything bad
> >about it. The 120v Orion Dew Zapper would serve me better; but I am not all
> >that comfortable with that much current hooked directly to the tube. Any
> >suggestions from experience would be appreciated. (I have a 10" LX-200)
> >....Bill
> >
> >
> >===========================
> >Documex....Information is power....
> >===========================
> >
> >
> The Kendrick system is a bit pricey perhaps, but it works well and
> is easy to use. It also has the advantage that you can de-mist
> eyepieces, finders etc too.
> For a cheap system that's easier than a hair drier, build a 12"
> extension tube from card for the front of the scope, or get the
> $15 velcro tube assembly from Orion. Works perfectly!
>
I can second this.. the extension tube also cuts out a lot of stray
light input.I make mine out of 1mm thick modelling plywood
from model shops.This is steamed with a kettle into a tube then
glued together and painted Meade blue outside and matt black inside.
Costs about 10 dollars not the rip off price for the commercial
versions.
Brandon S. Jones


View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: 120V dew zapper problem., Robert Preston
Next message: vibration pads for the LX-200, CLIFFORD PETERSON
Next message in thread: (no subject), Dick.Green.