Re: (telrad) [M]: solar astronomy, ie, Telrad destruction
| Subject: | Re: (telrad) [M]: solar astronomy, ie, Telrad destruction |
| From: | Kal Krishnan |
| Date: | Tue Dec 31 16:24:00 1996 |
Yep; another point here is that if you leave the Telrad on, there IS an
off-chance that you would be tempted to glance through it to check
alignment out of sheer habit! I am a great believer in active accident
avoidance, when I know how! Take the Telrad off, it is easy enough to do
anyway.
off-chance that you would be tempted to glance through it to check
alignment out of sheer habit! I am a great believer in active accident
avoidance, when I know how! Take the Telrad off, it is easy enough to do
anyway.
- Kal Krishnan
(krishnan@flatconnect.com)
----------
> From: DLSW-Mote, Thomas A. <cstom@datalynxsw.com>
> To: mapug@shore.net
> Subject: Re: (telrad) [M]: solar astronomy, ie, Telrad destruction
> Date: Tuesday, December 31, 1996 4:59 PM
>
> Mark and Gerry,
>
> You both have a very good point. I dont know how long it
> would take the relatively small amount of sun light reflected
> from the 45 degree plane glass into the projector lens and
> reticle to fry the reticle. I also agree that sunlight from
> directly above the lens would be much more effective. I think
> that I will continue to remove my Telrad when doing solar work
> anyhow. :-)
>
> Tom
