Sponsored By:
[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thread-next]

Subject: [M]: The ETX article in S&T
From: RA
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Wed Jan 01 00:12:18 1997

Looks like the ETX is a pretty ideal small telescope but will it
outperform a C5+ for planetary performance?
Reason I ask is that I am hearing allot of positive hype on the Mak
design and people are telling me it will out perform a 8" and 10" F10
Schmidt for planetary use.
Ive talked with a few people who own both C5 and ETX and they all say
the C5+ is the hands down winner everytime in every catagory, including
planetary usage. Isnt this comparison valid: ETX vs C5+ / Meade 7" mak vs
Meade 10" F10?

Ralph

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: [M]: Maksutov Casagrain question?, RA
Next message: Re: [M]: Maksutov Casagrain question?, RA
Next message in thread: [M]: Re: The ETX article in S&T, Donald Tabbutt