Sponsored By:

[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thread-next]

Subject: Re: "Compact" Newtonian vs. SCT's
From: Robert Fields
Reply To: mapug@shore.net
Date: Tue Jan 17 11:24:32 1995

Found this thread on the newsgroups and thought it might make for some good discussion here.

-Robert

In article <3fgapi$h2d@newsbf02.news.aol.com> you wrote: : A good Newtonian will ALLWAYS outperform a telescope of the SCT design, : the SCT is an optical compromise, but performs reasonably well for : general purpose work that most amateurs are involved with. For CCD imaging : and astrophotograpph get a good RFT Newtonian everytime ove any kind of a : SCT telescope (the best CCD images come from Newtonians).

: Glenn Gombert : Dayton, Ohio

--
__________________________________________________________________________
                  --=>   A S T R O M A R T   <=--
         Your Free InterNet Astro Classified MarketPlace
              ~~~~
                      --= TO SUBSCRIBE =--
            Send an E-mail to LISTSERV@NETCOM.COM
         In the message body type: SUBSCRIBE ASTRO_FS

--= TO PLACE AN AD =-- Send your ad to ASTRO_FS@netcom.com

The more participants the better. Feel free to copy and display this sig. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: My adapter died!, TinyHost@aol.com
Next message: Defunct 18v adapter, James Cottle
Next message in thread: Re: "Compact" Newtonian vs. SCT's, Robert Preston